Why Occupy Wall Street? Here’s why.

The surprise $5.00 debit card fee banks recently imposed on their customers is going away.  Bank of American, Sun Trust, JP Morgan Chase and others are now trying to tiptoe off the front pages.

We have listened to our customers very closely over the last few weeks and recognize their concern with our proposed debit usage fee,” David Darnell, the bank’s co-chief operating officer, said in a statement.

JPMorgan Chase & Co and Wells Fargo & Co last week decided to cancel test programs, while SunTrust Banks Inc and Regions Financial Corp said on Monday they would end monthly charges and reimburse customers.

For most Americans, the fee was a step too far from those ‘job creators’ who earlier wallowed in ugly, amoral behaviors screwing not just us but each other, and sent us into a four year trailspin of a recession that could take as long as a decade to repair.

This time, I think those ‘bankers’ peeked out their windows and were a bit frightened by what they saw.  So I’ll call this a victory for Occupy Wall Streeters around the nation and around the world.

Thomas Friedman (forever the inspiration for the wartime Friedman Unit, or the F.U. for short), reminds us this week about one Citigroup transgression for which they’ve just been fined $285million (chump change these days), a transgression emblematic of the duplicitous and amoral behavior that hurt us all so badly.

. . .  with one hand, Citibank sold a package of toxic mortgage-backed securities to unsuspecting customers — securities that it knew were likely to go bust — and, with the other hand, shorted the same securities — that is, bet millions of dollars that they would go bust.     

According to the SEC complaint:

. . . Citigroup exercised “significant influence” over choosing which $500 million of the $1 billion worth of assets in the deal, and the global bank deliberately chose collateralized debt obligations, or C.D.O.’s, built from mortgage loans almost sure to fail. According to The Wall Street Journal, the S.E.C. complaint quoted one unnamed C.D.O. trader outside Citigroup as describing the portfolio as resembling something your dog leaves on your neighbor’s lawn. “The deal became largely worthless within months of its creation,” The Journal added. “As a result, about 15 hedge funds, investment managers and other firms that invested in the deal lost hundreds of millions of dollars, while Citigroup made $160 million in fees and trading profits.”

For decades we’ve let them indulge in the worst form of crony capitalism without the rule of law that should govern such institutions. Unbridled greed took hold. And it’s been destroying capitalism. It is anti-capitalist.

Friedman goes on:

. . . .what happened to us? Our financial industry has grown so large and rich it has corrupted our real institutions through political donations. As Senator Richard Durbin. . .  bluntly said in a 2009 radio interview, despite having caused this crisis, these same financial firms “are still the most powerful lobby on Capitol Hill. And they, frankly, own the place.”       

Our Congress today is a forum for legalized bribery. One consumer group using information from Opensecrets.org calculates that the financial services industry spent $2.3 billion on federal campaign contributions from 1990 to 2010, which was more than the health care, energy, defense, agriculture and transportation industries combined.

We can’t afford this any longer.

Indeed we cannot. We now stand witness to the destruction of what it took us 250 years to build.

I don’t see anyone with power stepping up, leaving it up to the people.  And, no matter the tired 1960’s stereotypes the right is so enthralled with, that is why we have Occupy Wall Street.

8 responses to “Why Occupy Wall Street? Here’s why.

  1. If someone had told us about this shift in August, I’d thought it very unlikely.

    It’s sort of like the 1% (or 0.1% as Krugman points out today) going from the dominating offensive to silence, defense, panic – and now retreat.
    Not that it can stop the mounting push-back on several fronts. It probably just energizes the movement. No stopping until trust-busting and campaign reforms are done, then the rest will follow by a democratic machinery for the best of the people and country.

    Like

  2. Face it — we need mechanisms that hold decision makers fully accountable for their decisions—reward the good, penalise the bad. A Free Market would do exactly that.

    To add cheer to your post/comments: a Free Market doesn’t exist anywhere. And it won’t, so long as people can vote themselves a Free Lunch out of someone else’s earnings.

    Like

    • Yep. Free-market and liberal democracies are still the best alternative.
      Monopolies and Senators for sale are not.

      Like

    • And any reform we need in DC is blocked because the very people who needs to be constrained are the ones who write the laws. Not promising!

      Like

      • This is why ‘occupy’ movements will be/are an ineffective flash in the pan. Much the same as petitions and rights to assemble and wave banners; too easily ignored by the business-as-usual powers who write the laws.
        Needed is something they cannot ignore. A protest can be dispersed, with gunfire if the rulers deem it necessary. A strike can be broken up by the police, hired thugs (same thing), or gunfire if deemed necessary.
        But what would work would be if the governed simply withdrew their consent by withdrawing their funding … by simply (after adequately stocking up) staying at home. Enough people staying home, across the board, for long enough would bring any dictatorship to its knees. Attempts to either make scapegoats (or decimate) would have to be met met by force; home invasions can and should be repelled.

        No working = no tax, no tax = no government.

        It could be done entirely non-violently by simply staying home, and NOT accepting any substitutes for genuine Freedom. A big ask …

        Like

        • In the 1970’s Caesar Chavez in CA led a union of grape pickers. He staged a walk out and inspired a national boycott of grapes. Americans simply stopped buying grapes! Within a few weeks the owners agreed to raise wages and improve working condidtions.

          It can happen.

          Like

  3. Pingback: Occupy Wall Street Debate Between a Liberal and a Conservative « Wandering American

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s